This brand may withstand the test of time, but our trained taste buds were more critical of this special dark chocolate bar. There's nothing special about this bar. If you're only tried this one and you claim to not like dark chocolate, try one of the preceding ones. Rather than melting in our mouths, the square left a grainy consistency. Besides tasting unnatural, this dark chocolate bar had a disturbing sweetness that seemed to try to mask the tart undertones.
Instead of dissolving on your tongue as you would expect, this Ghirardelli Intense Dark bar crumbled, crashed, and burned. The squares were small but dense and chunkier than the other bars tested. What caught us off guard the most was the chocolate's slightly smoky aftertaste. We can probably chalk that up to the natural and artificial flavors. The thick and chunky squares were hard to bite into, but the loud crunch was oddly satisfying. The bar boasted an unexpected yet intriguing smokiness, which we were indifferent about.
We think this pick would pair well with the earthiness of a full-bodied red wine. Lindt's master chocolatiers struck a balanced flavor that wasn't bitter or too sweet. It tasted more like an intense milk chocolate bar than a dark bar, making it an ideal treat for those getting used to the taste of concentrated cacao. Welcome to the dark side! The divinely velvety texture coupled with the balanced flavor made this pick our 1.
This leads researchers to believe Cocoa is good for your gut health. Phytates; Cocoa powder is high in Phytates at around mg per grams. Phytates are an anti-nutrient, which means they prevent beneficial nutrients from being absorbed by your digestive processes. This is a concern for the people who eat raw Cacoa. Not only is raw Cacoa high in anti-nutrients, but there is also a higher level of live disease spreading bacteria and mould due to animal feces. All the purported health benefits are derived from this.
Unfortunately, when the seeds are processed roasted , thus creating Cocoa powder and Cocoa butter, much of the nutrition is lost. Fortunately, so are most of the phytates and nasty bugs.
The way I see it, the best and most pronounced health benefit from Chocolate is the mere fact that it makes you feel good. As long as you do not over indulge, then this little extravagance can give you multiple health benefits simply because of that. Feeling good helps your immune system, which in turn helps fights off infection, helps healing and so forth.
Sugar; Refined sugar is known to be extremely stressful for your immune system, and directly feeds parasites and other pathogens. Milk; There are various substances in milk that can be harmful to humans. Lactose; A constituent of milk which is difficult to digest, and known to cause bloating. Cocoa butter; Fat which is processed from the cocoa bean.
As this fat is cold pressed, it appears to be beneficial to some degree. There is a good spread of the different fats. Including a small percentage being Omega 3, and some lauric acid thrown in for good measure. Cocoa Mass; This is a substance derived from the Cacoa bean where the fat has been removed. Vegetable fat; This is no doubt a hydrogenated fat of some description — very difficult to digest, and toxic in large quantities.
These are added in order to help the chocolate melt in your mouth. These chemicals are toxic if eaten in large quantities. Soy lecithin; Another emulsifier which is made by processing the soya bean until all you are left with is a chemical gunk. Natural and artificial flavours ; These terms hide a multi tude of sins. One of them is MSG — the i m mune s ystem g rinder. Artificial flavours are worse, as the base can be crude oil, or coal tar, which when refined produces pleasing tastes and smells — mmm.
As you can see the list of ingredients is much shorter, so technically Lindt is healthier. Cocoa mass; Or cocoa liquor which is a liquid form, processed from cocoa nibs. This is the purest form of chocolate, and is very bitter. Sugar; See Above. It appears as though Lindt chocolate does not use as much sugar as Cadbury. Eat chocolate by all means — but only as a special treat.
Best Before. Manufactured By. Mondelez India Foods Pvt. Physiochemical Parameters. Cocoa solids are a mixture of many substances remaining after the cocoa butter is extracted from cocoa beans. Cocoa solids can range from a light brown to a deep reddish-brown colour. Cocoa solids were found in the range of Total Fat.
As per Indian Standards and FSS Regulations, the total fat — that is, the sum of saturated, monounsaturated, and polyunsaturated fats — in this category of chocolate should not be less than 25 per cent by mass. All the brands complied with the minimum requirement for total fat. Ritter Sport was found to contain the highest percentage of total fat, followed by Delaviuda. Amul had the least percentage of total fat. Sugar Sucrose. Sugar sucrose gives a natural sweet taste and uniform texture to the product.
As per Indian Standards, sugar should not be more than 60 per cent by mass. No limit for sugar content has been specified in FSS Regulations. Less sugar is considered to be better. All the brands were found within the limit specified for sugar content. Ritter Sport contained the minimum amount of sugar and hence was rated higher. Cadbury Bournville has the most amount of sugar among the tested brands. Moisture Content. Moisture content is defined as the percentage of water in a product.
Moisture is found in almost every food product in some quantity, but its higher presence can affect the shelf life of the product. There is no specific requirement for moisture in the national standards for chocolate. All the brands contained less than one per cent moisture content. It ranged between 0. Highest moisture content was found in Moser Roth and the lowest was in Delaviuda.
Ash-Insoluble Ash. All the brands were found within the permissible limit for acid-insoluble ash. Lindt followed by Ritter Sport were found with the lowest percentage of acid-insoluble ash and hence scored higher. Vegetable Fat.
0コメント